Interrupted by President Trump, Western world thinkers have hardly given up on steadily rebuilding a hegemonic New World Order piece by piece, the globalist long-dreamed of a federalist One World Government with each nation ceding most of its national sovereignty to the United Nations.
First the monarchies were toppled, then the democracies. NATO appeared to be its first transnational global military machine. Our children will live to see how things develop with their plans…
“World federalism or global federalism is a political ideology advocating a supposedly democratic, federal world government…
Should Democrats return to power after Trump the project will begin forthwith.
First the monarchies were toppled, then the democracies were infiltrated. Wilsonian ideology(1) saw to that.
“World federalism or global federalism is a political ideology advocating a democratic, federal world government…
“in 1947, over 50 world federalist organizations formulated the Montreux Declaration, encapsulating the demands of the world federalist movement in light of WWII:
We world federalists are convinced that the establishment of a world federal government is the crucial problem of our time. Until it is solved, all other issues, whether national or international, will remain unsettled. It is not between free enterprise and planned economy, nor between capitalism and communism that the choice lies, but between federalism and power politics. Federalism alone can assure the survival of man.— Wikipedia
Aldous Huxley said, “Democracies will change their nature…” More…
Updated / SH
___________
(1) Legacy and Influence
Wilsonianism has profoundly shaped U.S. foreign policy debates:
Proponents see it as inspiring liberal internationalism, underpinning institutions like the UN, NATO, and post-WWII order, and justifying interventions for democracy or human rights (e.g., echoes in post-Cold War policies).
Critics view it as naive, interventionist, or a cover for American hegemony/imperialism. It contrasts with realism (power balances, national interest) and has been debated in contexts like the Iraq War or broader “liberal hegemony.”
Not all were leftists or had bad motives; not a few leaders simply thought it a practical solution to all nations living under an unprecedented nuclear Sword of Damocles. Others however had more occult objectives in the dubious name of “science,” especially eugenics, legalized global abortion and population control in general, as well as a determination to remake a new syncretistic global world religion, and transform and integrate sovereign democracies into a new and final homogeneous global socialism and construct a single international police force and judiciary apparatus to judge international crimes within a so-called UN rules-based liberal Order. The UN would, of course, make these binding rules.
++++
Share this website with friends and acquaintances: https://catholiccritique.com/
