Socialism in Dreams

“To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots… Modern society is hypnotized by socialism. It is prevented by socialism from seeing the mortal danger it is in. And one of the greatest dangers of all is that you have lost all sense of danger, you cannot even see where it’s coming from as it moves swiftly towards you.”  —   Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Socialism in reality is very different from Socialism in dreams. It is built on and by Marxist theory which can sound nice on paper.

Socialism is proposed as a centralized “economic” system. The fact is, Socialism is far more than mere economic theory. It is built on envy and the quest for power, is totalitarian in scope and proposes to “liberate” individuals, family members(1), even human nature (e.g., gender) itself, from its “structures of oppression”. Often, but not always, private property is abolished or restricted, and industries can be nationalized in the name of “the people”.

History tells the sorry story: Socialism, under the pretext of speaking on behalf of the disenfranchised of society, is a comprehensive, adaptive, (and, at bottom, atheistic[2]) explanation of reality and seeks to increasingly control and direct “the herd” from the top down. Communism is its logical goal.

Solzhenitsyn in Soviet Prison (the Gulag)

Marxist abstractions such as “capitalism” cannot really amount to a world view or to a politics. It is not built on theory. Free Markets within a moral framework are really what is intended here as the practical ideal in politically free societies. Free markets are simply the non-coercive way to allow for both the free production and exchange of goods, while protecting individualist significance and freedom, unlike Communism / Marxism. And the Free Market works very effectively as history shows, even if at times it has been adulterated by forms of corporate greed, e.g, violating Antitrust principles or the unjust exploitation of workers or territories, which can and should be corrected. Such adulterations can actually serve to provoke the Socialist excuse and must be corrected.

Even China eventually had to cave to the Free Market’s main attractions to sustain an economy, while retaining its Marxist ideology in order to farm the human person.

Nonetheless, the Free Market, must serve the whole human person made in the image and likeness of the Creator. Without men and women who understand and truly care about people, peace, and spiritual values (and not just the almighty dollar) it can easily fall prey to the greed of heartless materialists and money manipulators. Neither should those of us who believe in the infinite superiority of a Free Market’s strengths over Socialism’s trajectories impulsively label every form of social security for the truly weak as “Socialism’. Not every kind of moral social assistance, it should go without saying, violates the best principles of the Free Market, the interests of peace, and the Common Good. — SH

Scruton Debate: Does the Left Have Right On It’s Side


The Frankfurt School. Herbert Marcuse’s World.

The Theology of Marxism

The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]

(1) “Abolition of the family! … The bourgeois family will disappear, in the course of history as its supplement [private property] disappears, and both will vanish with the destruction of capital.” The Communist Manifesto, Chapter 2, Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels.

Too, Marxists know that if the family as a foundational societal institution is destroyed then it will be the centralized State that will regulate the numbers of human births “allowed” to be born.

[2] Representing itself as respecting all religions, it actually hates them all and seeks to undermine them, and substitute itself for the only true religion. Socialism, again, tends towards Communism, and will brook no rival Ultimate for very long once in power. This is what makes the “religious socialist” either the most naive or the most pernicious of persons.


— Jordan Peterson’s surprise over a Putin quote

— April 11, 2022: Shanghai Total Covid dystopia

See also, Paulo Freire  “the prophet of the Marxist Faith” in U.S. education today.  And his connection to Liberation Theologies, Don Helder Camara, and the “liberation” of the convents and Catholic schools. The cynical inversion of real, traditional, education.— James Lindsay

Making excuses for violence for political ends. The book at Amazon

The book

Note: In days of old only those could inherit property who were capable of defending it; in general, men. There was a reason for it. Today’s aristocrats by contrast, the mega-rich corporations, promote free wild sex and rainbow gender ideology and surgeries, even to children, in exchange for their monied Class privileges. And they radically restrict dissent. Real Communists by contrast will just confiscate all private property and kill off all serious dissent. I suppose I’d rather be the subject of attempts at mere lies and informational manipulation than killed outright or put in ghastly Gulags as Solzhenitsyn was?

Wokeness is corporate driven. The corporations use race and gender as their pretended moral high ground and battering ram. If history is any judge, once the rainbow corporations get their New World they’ll likely turn on all dissent of whatever race, ethnicity and political view, just as China and the Soviets turned against their own useful “activists” once they were finished with them.

Updated May 2022

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s