Hillary Clinton’s Classified Documents Were Not Bleached, They Got Hammered.
Queen Warmonger Hillary Clinton Complains About “Men Starting Wars”.
During her self-titled annual awards ceremony at Georgetown University …, Hillary Clinton said that the biggest obstacle to peace and security around the world is “men starting wars.”
During the Q&A segment of the event, Clinton was asked by a student, “What do you see as the biggest challenge for women, peace, and security over the next ten years?”
“Well I think the biggest challenge is men starting wars,” Clinton replied, adding, “You know, I don’t think they have enough to do.”
Which would have come across as a humorous and relatable answer, if it had come from pretty much anyone else on the entire planet.
The single strongest argument against Hillary Rodham Clinton’s suggestion that only men start wars is the career of Hillary Rodham Clinton. This is after all the same woman who chortled with delight when she found out Muammar Gaddafi had been lynched in the streets following his US-led overthrow in Libya during her tenure as secretary of state, saying “I’m sure it did” when asked if his death had anything to do with her visit to the country.
The same woman who as secretary of state promoted the plan of arming extremists in Syria with the goal of toppling Damascus. The same woman who as a senator played a pivotal role in convincing the Democratic Party to support the invasion of Iraq based on lies. The same woman who as first lady said she “urged” her husband Bill Clinton to launch the bombing campaign that would leave Serbia and Kosovo covered in cluster munitions. The same woman who as a US presidential candidate advocated a no-fly zone in Syria which would have required attacks on Russian war planes who violated it, and endorsed the same brinkmanship policies in Ukraine which eventually provoked the Russian invasion.
When Tulsi Gabbard famously dubbed Clinton “the queen of warmongers” in 2019, it wasn’t just empty rhetoric. There is no woman alive who anyone could argue is more deserving of that title. If you’d have told me there was a Hillary Rodham Clinton Awards ceremony prior to my having read about it, I would have assumed it was an event where women receive trophies for killing large numbers of human beings with military violence.
It is of course true that men have been the drivers of the overwhelming majority of wars throughout the ages, but that’s just what’s so disgusting about the modern iteration of “feminism” that Hillary Clinton rode to prominence on. The girlboss “feminism” of the Hillary Clinton age has ceased to mean advancing women’s interests and ensuring that women are treated as equals to men, and has become a vapid celebration of examples of women proving that they can be just as murderous, tyrannical and abusive as any man.
.@HillaryClinton asked what is the biggest challenge to women’s peace and security around the world:
“I think the biggest challenge is men starting wars,” she said. “It seems like they don’t have enough to do.”
@giwps #HRCAwards pic.twitter.com/iV3XlrBcZf
— Josh Rogin (@joshrogin) October 5, 2023
That was the zeitgeist that Hillary Clinton rode her 2016 presidential campaign on, and when the American public recoiled in horror and refused to vote for her, it was spun as a victory for misogyny. It should have been spun as a victory for would-be bombing victims who live in US-targeted nations.
Hillary Clinton is all the worst things about modern liberals and the Democratic Party. She is a blood-spattered psychopath who has dedicated her life to serving all the worst impulses of the human species — imperialism, militarism, capitalism, authoritarianism, and, yes, patriarchy — wearing a grinning plastic mask of civil rights and social justice to convince people to let her in the door.
She’s one of the creepiest things you could possibly imagine, and the sooner her and those like her are gone and forgotten, the better.
______________
My work is entirely reader supported so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to.
+
+
76 Americans killed, including 25 children.
I have read similar reports over the years: “the real “Woman in Charge” responsible for the deaths of 76 Branch Davidians, including 21 children and two pregnant women was was Hillary, not Janet Reno”. — Read more
+
Hillary’s Classified Documents Were Not Bleached, They Got Hammered
Without consequence. “The conclusion from the FBI was that Clinton treated sensitive, classified information in her emails “extremely” carelessly. But then-FBI director James Comey said there was no evidence that she intentionally deleted emails to conceal them or obstruct justice.
Then-FBI Director James Comey walks to the podium to make a statement about the Clinton emails investigation at FBI Headquarters in Washington, Tuesday, July 5, 2016. (AP)
Politifact. By Samantha PuttermanJune 16, 2023
IF YOUR TIME IS SHORT
- The FBI investigated 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton over her use of a private email server when she was secretary of state.
- The investigation revealed a Clinton aide, but not Clinton herself, in two instances destroyed some of Clinton’s mobile devices by breaking them or hitting them with a hammer.
- In an attempt to permanently delete archived emails, her staff used a free software program called “BleachBit,” which wipes data from computer servers. Neither Clinton nor her team used physical chemicals to remove the information, as Donald Trump has colorfully described.
Hillary Clinton’s emails are back in the news.
Shortly after former President Donald Trump was indicted on charges over his handling of classified documents, he and his allies have issued condemnations about the former 2016 Democratic nominee never being charged, claiming a double standard.
Many of these claims have also mentioned a couple of things that might sound peculiar to the uninitiated: bleach and hammers.
“The subpoena was there and she decided to delete, acid wash and then smash and destroy her cellphones with a hammer,” Trump said during a June 13 speech at his Bedminster, New Jersey, club hours after pleading not guilty in a Miami courtroom. Trump called the deletion process costly, saying that “nobody” does it “because of the expense,” a claim he has repeated for years.
Trump’s defenders echoed his claims on social media: “There is a two-tier system of justice. Hillary Clinton, after receiving a subpoena can bleach emails and destroy evidence with hammers? But Trump is the one they go after because he is a threat to the system,” reads text on a June 12 TikTok video.
So, what is this all about?
Clinton’s use of a private email account during her time as secretary of state from 2009 to 2013 prompted an FBI investigation into her handling of classified information in those emails.
Officials became aware that Clinton used a personal email address on private servers in her Chappaqua, New York, home in 2014 after she turned over about 30,000 work-related emails to the State Department and deleted the rest, saying those involved personal matters, such as her daughter’s wedding plans.
In July 2016, about four months before the presidential election, the FBI announced the findings of its investigation. It said that classified information had been improperly transmitted, but carelessness, not an intent to skirt the law, was the cause.
Some of the information in the agency’s report detailed methods Clinton staffers used to destroy old, unwanted phones and wipe servers of exported data. Here are the details.
The hammer
The FBI’s report from September 2016 mentioned that a Clinton aide used a hammer to destroy some of Clinton’s old mobile devices.
“(Clinton aide Justin) Cooper did recall two instances where he destroyed Clinton’s old mobile devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer,” the document said.
During its investigation, the FBI determined that 13 devices were associated with Clinton’s phone numbers and personal email, eight of which were used when she was secretary of state. When the Justice Department requested that all devices be handed over, Clinton’s attorneys said they were “unable to locate any of these devices.” One Clinton aide told agents that the locations of Clinton’s unwanted devices would “frequently become unknown.”
Security researchers said at the time that destroying old devices isn’t itself suspicious; While Clinton’s critics see the destroyed devices as an effort to conceal damaging information, the actions could also be a clumsy attempt to protect data.
Jonathan Zdziarski, an iOS forensics expert and security researcher, told Wired in a contemporaneous report that, because Clinton was relying on aides to act as her entire information technology team, it was the right idea from a security standpoint to try to destroy the devices rather than letting them sit exposed.
The bottom line: Clinton did not herself use a hammer to destroy cellphones, but people working for her did on at least one or two occasions.
Catholic Critique 